BugZero found this defect 1308 days ago.
Data sources
All data on this page is proprietary to BugZero® or gathered from public sources
7/19/2023
SQL Server 2016 Developer - duplicate (do not use)
SQL Server 2016 Enterprise - duplicate (do not use)
SQL Server 2016 Enterprise Core - duplicate (do not use)
SQL Server 2016 Standard - duplicate (do not use)
SQL Server 2017 on Windows (all editions)
build lower than 14.0.3026.27
14.0.3026.27
Assume that you have an Always On Availability Group (AG) in SQL Server 2016 and 2017. When you process a read query on a secondary replica, the performance might be much slower than the primary replica due to frequent DIRTY_PAGE_TABLE_LOCK waits.
This issue occurs because of contention between the read query and the redo thread, and because the table is locked.
This fix is included in the following updates for SQL Server: Cumulative Update 8 for SQL Server 2017 Cumulative Update 1 for SQL Server 2016 Service Pack 2 Cumulative Update 9 for SQL Server 2016 Service Pack 1
Each new build for SQL Server contains all the hotfixes and security fixes that were in the previous build. We recommend that you install the latest build for your version of SQL Server: Latest cumulative update for SQL Server 2017 The latest build for SQL Server 2016
To work around this issue you can use a single redo thread instead of a parallel redo thread by enabling Trace Flag 3459.
When read-only queries are running on a readable secondary replica, query threads attempt to apply pending log redo operations and need to collaborate with redo worker threads with DIRTY_PAGE_TABLE_LOCK waits, which can be frequently generated and slow down both redo and query performance if there are concurrent redo workloads. The performance issue associated with DIRTY_PAGE_TABLE_LOCK wait is addressed in the cumulative update release for SQL Server 2016 SP and SQL Server 2017 mentioned in this article. For more information, you can see the following blog on Availability group secondary replica redo model and performance.
Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed in the "Applies to" section.
Learn about the terminology Microsoft uses to describe software updates.